• FR
  • Inform me about new class actions

    • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

    Coming soon

    Notice about our registration form
    Completing the form does not guarantee you any compensation

    Please note that completing this form does not guarantee you any compensation.

    Indeed, it will ultimately be up to the court to decide on the merits of the class action and the terms of compensation. In addition, the eligibility criteria to receive compensation could be modified by the court, which could result in your exclusion from the class action.

    Please also note that we will not conduct a detailed analysis of each individual case until there is a final judgment or settlement in the file. Completing this form does not mean that you are eligible.

    We will inform the people who have registered of any final outcome in the class action. We will communicate with them by email. We invite you to notify us of any changes to your email address.

    We also invite you to keep informed through our website which we will update regularly.

    We thank you for your interest in this class action.

    Continue

    Completed class actions

    Riendeau v. Brault & Martineau Inc.

    Illegal publicity of consumer credit

    Completed file:

    In September 2002, Mr. Riendeau filed a motion for authorization to institute a class action against Brault & Martineau.

    The class action alleged that Brault & Martineau intentionally violated certain imperative provisions of the Consumer Protection Act through its advertising of consumer credit. Mr. Riendeau seeks the reimbursement of financing fees paid by consumers, damages and punitive damages.

    On October, 17, 2007, the Madam Justice Claudine Roy of the Quebec Superior Court ordered Brault & Martineau to pay $2,000,000 in punitive damages to consumers who bought and financed goods between June 1st, 2000 and December 31, 2003.

    Madam Justice Roy concluded that Brault & Martineau did not respect the provisions intended by the legislator to ensure that consumers are able to make an enlightened choice between cash payment and financing. According to Madam Justice Roy, the advertisements of Brault & Martineau should not incite consumers to use credit and should allow the consumers to know the exact cost of the financing programs offered.

    On February 26, 2010, the Court of Appeal confirmed the decision of Justice Roy and thereby confirmed the availability of an autonomous recourse in punitive damages under the Consumer Protection Act, an important precedent in Quebec law.

    The amount of the judgement has been distributed among class members and the claim period is now over.

    06/11